LEGAL PATHWAYS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION: A CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Abstract

Climate change presents one of the most pressing global challenges, requiring coordinated legal and policy responses across jurisdictions. This research undertakes a comparative analysis of legal frameworks for climate change mitigation, focusing on how different countries and regions design, implement, and enforce climate-related laws. The study examines international agreements such as the Paris Agreement alongside national legislation, regulatory instruments, and market-based mechanisms to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By analyzing enforcement strategies, compliance mechanisms, and the integration of climate policies into broader governance structures, the research highlights both strengths and shortcomings in existing legal pathways. Special attention is given to the role of courts, administrative bodies, and civil society in shaping climate governance. The findings aim to identify best practices, innovative approaches, and areas requiring reform, ultimately offering recommendations for harmonizing legal frameworks and enhancing global cooperation. This comparative perspective contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable development and provides actionable insights for policymakers, legal scholars, and international organizations seeking to strengthen climate change mitigation efforts.